Abstract
As part of Hindutva’s politico-economic perspective on India, with a specific focus on the agrarian economy, the current Bharatiya Janata Party government (henceforth the BJP), which represents Hindutva ideology, brought in three Ordinances on June 5, 2020, in the name of reforming agricultural marketing and improving farmer welfare. All three were given hurried Parliamentary and Presidential approval, without stakeholder consultation or proper parliamentary scrutiny, before becoming law in September 2020 (Singh, T et al 2021).22 These Ordinances were the following: the Farmers’ (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Ordinance, 2020; the Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Ordinance, 2020; and the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020.23 On the face of it, these farm laws may appear to be measures aimed solely at agricultural marketing reform. However, to view them only as marketing reform measures would be deceptive and illusory. Penetrating behind those illusions may reveal to us the reality of deeper connections between these laws and the historically specific conjuncture of Indian capitalism, and the link between that conjuncture of Indian capitalism and the Hindutva ideological perspective on India.References
Anderson, Perry (2013). The Indian Ideology. London/New York: Verso.
Bettelheim, C. (1968). India Independent. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
Chakravarty, S. (1989). Development Planning: The Indian Experience. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Chandra, Bipin; Mukherjee, Mridula; Mukherjee, Aditya; Mahajan, Sucheta; Panikkar, K. N. (eds) (2017). India’s Struggle for Independence: 1857-1947. Penguin India: Delhi.
Desai, A. R. (1959). Social Background of Indian Nationalism. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
Desai, A. R. (1984). India’s Path of Development: A Marxist Approach. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
Desai, M. (1975). India: Emerging Contradictions of Slow Capitalist Development. In: Robin Blackburn (ed.) Explosions in a Subcontinent. London: Penguin, 1975, 11-50. (Included also in Desai 2005.)
Desai, M. (2005). Development and Nationhood: Essays in the Political Economy of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Deshpande, Satish and Palshikar, Sanjay (eds) (2019). Sectarian Violence in India: Hindu–Muslim Conflict, 1966–2015, India: Orient BlackSwan and EPW.
Dhanda, Meena (2021). Closing address to the International Conference ‘Anti-Caste Thought: Theory, Politics and Culture’. University of Wolverhampton, UK, October 30 https://theperiyarproject.com/2021/11/01/closing-address-for-anti-caste-thought-conference/.
Jagat, Gurbachan (2021). ‘BSF imbroglio in Punjab’. The Tribune, October 31.
Jalal, A. (1985). The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mohapatra, Subas (ed.) (2017). Indian Society and Culture. Delhi and London: Taylor and Francis.
Rehman, M. (ed.) (2016): Communalism in Postcolonial India: Changing Contours, India: Routledge.
Singh, P. (2008). Federalism, Nationalism and Development: India and the Punjab economy. London/New York: Routledge (Second Indian reprint 2019).
Singh, P. (2014). ‘The Indian Ideology by Perry Anderson – a review’. Socialist Resistance, June 16.
Singh, P. (2020a). ‘BJP’s farming policies: deepening agrobusiness capitalism and centralisation’. Economic and Political Weekly, October 10, 55(41):14-17.
Singh, P. (2020b). ‘BJP’s Agrarian Agenda: Strengthening Agro-Business Capitalism and Weakening Federalism’. Radical Socialist, December 4
Singh, P. (2020c). ‘Centre's Agricultural Marketing Reforms Are an Assault on Federalism’. The Wire, June 20 (https://thewire.in/agriculture/agriculture-marketing-reforms-federalism).
Singh, P. (2020d). ‘As cracks in NDA Widen, Is BJP Ideology Compatible with Regional Identities’. The Wire, 22 September. (https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-punjab-akali-dal-shiv-sena-regional-alliances).
Singh, P (2020e). ‘Les agriculteurs contre l’agenda agro-industriel de Modi’. Le Grand Continent, 22 décembre (https://legrandcontinent.eu/fr/2020/12/22/les-agriculteurs-contre-lagenda-agro-industriel-de-modi/).
Singh, Tanya, Singh, Pritam and Dhanda, Meena (2021). ‘Resisting a “Digital Green Revolution”: Agri-logistics, India’s New Farm Laws and the Regional Politics of Protest’. Capitalism Nature Socialism, Volume 32(2), June:1-21.
(DOI:10.1080/10455752.2021.1936917),
(https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10455752.2021.1936917).
Singh, P. (2021a). ‘Aux sources de la révolte paysanne en Inde: capitalisme de l’agrobusiness et centralisation’. CONTRETEMPS REVUE DE CRITIQUE COMMUNISTE, 26 janvier (http://www.contretemps.eu/inde-modi-bjp-capitalisme-agrobusiness-mouvement-
paysan/?fbclid=IwAR1h1Uhc51enzvGavQ_VeoFet6QELny75dP3ciTxmmU3hnx zYQYEo8Qz4Eg).
Singh, P. (2021b). ‘INDIA, Las raíces de la revuelta campesina: contra el agronegocio capitalista y la centralización’. viento sur, 30 ENERO
(https://vientosur.info/las-raices-de-la-revuelta-campesina-contra-el-agronegocio-capitalista-y-la-
centralizacion/?fbclid=IwAR3GMZjvbl_2_rfo_PFIX7UzmxGzSwGJ39OKCnmV MUN0ak1zJAKLkR7N6UA).
Singh, P. (2021c). ‘Behind the Indian Farmers Struggle’. Anti-Capitalist Resistance. February 10 (https://anticapitalistresistance.org/behind-the-indian-farmers-struggle/).
Singh, P. (2021d). ‘Indian farmers confront agribusiness and Hindu nationalist agenda of Modi’. Red and Green Labour, February 21
Singh, P. (forthcoming). ‘Farm Laws, Federalism and Farm Protests: India and Punjab’. Journal of Sikh and Punjab Studies, 29:1.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Pritam Singh